Antisémitisme / Islamisme Qu’ont-ils en Commun? Et sont-ils tout aussi importants l’un et l’autre?

Un billet de Abigail Hirsch
traduit par Hélène Anna
ISGAP, l’ Institut pour l’Étude de l’Antisémitisme parraine des conférenciers effectuent des recherches sur le phénomène de l’antisémitisme. J’ai assisté à presque toutes les conférences à l’Université McGilll à Montréal  depuis le début car je suis également mandatée pour filmer les conférences.
Gunther Jikeli, un spécialiste sur cette question, vient d’écrire un livre dans lequel il expose ses recherches sur l’état actuel de l’antisémitisme en Europe. Il a récemment présenté les fruit de ses recherches dans le cadre de ces conférences.
Jikeli book
Jikeli a interrogé les populations musulmanes vivant en Europe et les populations non-musulmanes. L’article de l’investigative project résume certaines de ses conclusions.
La plupart de ces enquêtes étaient basées sur les réponses des sujets aux stéréotypes sur les Juifs, en leur demandant de se mettre d’accord ou en désaccord avec de telles déclarations: «les Juifs ont trop de pouvoir dans la vie politique» et «les Juifs ont trop de pouvoir dans les médias.” Pays par pays, le nombre de musulmans d’accord avec ces déclarations antisémites a dépassé de loin celui des non-musulmans.
Ce qui rend le rapport ISGAP particulièrement intéressant est la preuve qu’il offre contre la croyance communément répandue que la classe sociale, la discrimination et autres facteurs similaires jouent un rôle dans l’antisémitisme musulman en Europe. Jikeli note plutôt que “le niveau de l’antisémitisme augmente avec le niveau de religiosité et les interprétations fondamentalistes de l’Islam.” De plus, il ajoute : “bien que l’antisémitisme est particulièrement forte chez les fondamentalistes ainsi que pour les croyants et ceux qui pratiquent la religion musulmane, le niveau de l’antisémitisme parmi les moins religieux musulmans est encore plus élevé que dans la population générale.”
Aujourd’hui, tout le monde sait que les textes sacrés de l’Islam, le Coran et les Hadiths, sont remplis de prescriptions à haïr les Juifs, et à faire la guerre contre eux, parce qu’ils sont des gens mauvais et maudit par Allah. Même un musulman qui n’est pas très religieux a été élevé avec ces idées antisémites.
Néanmoins, cela ne veut pas dire que l’antisémitisme européen et nazi a totalement disparu. Cette réalité a elle aussi été corroborée par la recherche du professeur Jikeli. L’antisémitisme avoué par l’extrême droite est seulement légèrement inférieure à celui de la population musulmane en général.
Croyez-vous que ces inepties? Croyez-vous que les Juifs méritent d’être attaqués? Ont-ils méritent d’être attaqués dans l’Allemagne nazie?
Quelle est la similitude entre l’idéologie anti-juive nazie et de la haine anti-juive islamiste? Je crois que la similitude réside dans le fait que chacune de ces idéologies prétend qu’il ne peut atteindre son rôle messianique qu’en détruisant l’autre, en le diabolisant.
Maajid Nawaz, un ancien islamiste radical, explique ce qu’est le djihad:
Le djihad est une idée traditionnelle musulmane impliquant un combat, parfois un combat spirituel personnel, parfois un combat contre un ennemi extérieur. Le djihadisme, cependant, est tout autre chose: c’est la doctrine qui met de l’avant l’usage de la force pour répandre l’islamisme…
Il donne également une définition de l’Islam:
L’islam est une religion, et comme toute autre religion, il est diversifié. L’islamisme, en revanche, est la volonté d’imposer une seule version de l’islam sur toute la société. L’islamisme est pas l’islam, mais il est une émanation de l’islam. C’est la théocratie musulmane.
Aucune stratégie destinée à vaincre l’islamisme ne peut réussir que si l’islamisme lui-même et son expression violente dans le djihadisme ne sont pas d’abord nommé, isolé et compris. Il est fallacieux de prétendre que l’État islamique est entièrement dissociée de l’islam tout autant que d’affirmer qu’il est synonyme de l’islam. l’État islamique a en effet quelque chose à voir avec l’islam, ni «rien», ni «tout», mais quelque chose. Ce quelque chose c’est le fait que tous les islamistes justifient leurs arguments en utilisant écritures islamiques et cherchent à recruter des musulmans.
L’antisémitisme est une branche de l’idéologie islamiste anti-infidèle qui menace actuellement le tissu même de tous les Etats-Nations européens comme on le voit par les attaques aveugles récents en France, en Espagne, à Londres et aux Etats-Unis.
Tout comme un tyran devient plus fort quand personne ne se lève pour le contrer, l’antisémitisme se développera si les gens restent les bras croisés et refusent de nommer la bête, qu’elle vienne de musulmans ou non-musulmans. L’immoralité des antisémites et les djihadistes doit être exposée et toute violence doit être sévèrement traitées si l’Europe veut faire des progrès dans sa lutte contre l’islamisme et toute autre doctrine pernicieuse comme l’antisèmitisme.

anti antisemitism French

Antisemitism/Islamic Jihad/Do they have anything in common

Antisemitism/Islamic Jihad – Do they have anything in common?  And are they equally important? Prof. Gunther Jikeli of Germany has just published a book on his research of antisemitism among Muslims in Europe today.

Jikeli bookThe first graph below based on research by Fondapol surveyed Muslim populations and non-Muslim populations living in Europe. They were asked to agree or disagree with the following statements:

Screen Shot 2015-12-16 at 10.01.37 AMThe above graph measure what percentage of the population that self identifies as Muslim, or members of far left or far right organizations agree with each of these questions.  What do you think about the above statements? Do you agree with any of them?  Do you agree with the first question – “The Jews use today their status of victim-hood of the Nazi genocide during the second world war for their own interest?” According to the graph 40% of the European population whether Muslim far right or far left, agree with this statement. Do you agree with this statement? What about the second statement: 2. “The Jews have too much power in the economy and the financial world”?: What about the third statement 3 – “The Jews have too much power in the media?”. What about the fourth statement 4 – “The Jews have too much power in politics?” What about the fifth statement 5 – “The Jews are responsible for the current economic crisis”? What about the sixth statement 6 – There is a Zionist conspiracy on a global scale?”

And what about these questions: Are Jews evil? Are Zionists trying to take over the world?  Do Jews deserve to be attacked? Did they deserve to be attacked in Nazi Germany? What about Israelis? Are they any more criminal or evil than anyone else?

Perhaps you are among those, whether you are Muslim or not, who do not agree with these statements. Are you represented above or below the yellow line in the graph?  The line measures  the percentage of antisemitic ideas among those people who do not self identify as part of either the far left or the far right in Europe. Their agreement with the above statements  varies widely from 35 % of the population to 6% of the population polled depending on the individual question. In this way the graph examines the not always obvious beliefs about Jews in the general European population whether they are Muslims or not, whether they are members of the far left or the far right. The highest number, 35% of the European population believe that, “The Jews use today their status of victim-hood of the Nazi genocide during the second world war for their own interest?”. This is a sickening statistic attesting to the underlying antisemitic notions of the European public and attests to the lack of understanding of many in Europe that the systematic murder of six million Jews was not just another atrocity but a rupture of civilization. How did professors, philosophers such as Martin Heidegger, professionals, and the common man, acquiesce to the Nazi program of expulsion and murder of their Jewish compatriots, and so many other Jews just because they were born Jewish.

By now everyone knows that the sacred texts of Islam, the Koran and the Hadith are chock full of commands to hate the Jews because they are such evil people and cursed by Allah. The Jikeli research additionally offers evidence against the commonly held belief that social class, discrimination, and similar factors play a role in Muslim antisemitism. It is rather that the level of antisemitism rises with the level of religiosity and fundamentalist interpretations of Islam.(reference)

Moreover, anti-zionism, anti-Israel propaganda is also part of the ideology of Islamic Jihad. and more and more outrageous ideas about Israel and Jews are propagated every day by the Islamic world. Have you heard that Israel is the creator of Islamic Jihad? An article by Manfred Gerstenfeld exposes these outlandish ideas that are daily propagated by Islamic scholars.

 

Although Muslims are most prominent in their assent to these antisemitic tropes or lies about Jews, Europeans – on the far right and the far left are not far behind.

violent acts by whom 2015-12-16 at 9.57.49 AM

Where does European non-Muslim antisemitism come from? Again Manfred Gerstenfeld reminds us:

This idea of Jews being absolute evil is ensconced in history. Christianity has long promoted it by saying that the Jews were eternally responsible for killing the “son of god.” This was in their view the worst imaginable act. In his book, The Devil and the Jews, Joshua Trachtenberg wrote that medieval Christendom perceived the Jew as “sorcerer, murderer, cannibal, poisoner, blasphemer.”[13]

 

As you can see from this graph, some of them are Muslims, some are identified as belonging to the far right/Nazi parties and most are not identified. This exposes the lack of attention paid to these antisemitic violent crimes by the authorities and the public.

Sadly, anti-zionist, anti-Israel Muslim forces, often those advocating on behalf of Palestinian refugees, have long been active in poisoning the minds of  European/western students about Israel as well.  On many universities in Europe and in North America, Israel is equated with the Nazi state and with Apartheid South Africa, and similar calumnies, such as the IDF harvesting organs for trafficking and murdering babies.

The acceptance of such antisemitic ideas among Europeans, whether Muslim or not, is highlighted by the popularity of Dieudonne M’bala M’bala. Below are two slides created by Prof. Jikeli to illustrate this point.

Screen Shot 2015-12-16 at 10.40.15 AMScreen Shot 2015-12-16 at 10.40.59 AM

 

And just as any bully will only be strong if no one stands up to him, the silent acquiescence to antisemitic ideas by the general public has greatly emboldened the anti-semites and the jihadists and resulted in a massive increase in hostile antisemitic actions.

Antisemitism has greatly increased in France since the year 2000 as most people have stood idly by and refused to name the beast whether it comes from Muslims or non-Muslims. And this has resulted in a massive and increasing exodus of Jewish families from France where they feel unsafe. The increase in antisemitic acts and antisemitic violence is documented below.

 

Screen Shot 2015-12-16 at 9.36.01 AMHowever antisemitism is only one strand of the anti-infidel Islamic jihad ideology. And these supremacist false Islamic ideas currently threaten the fabric of all European and non-European western democratic nations as can be seen by the recent indiscriminate attacks in France, Spain, Belgium, England, Australia, Canada and the United States.

The picture below documents the recent attackers of innocent civilians in a cafe, in a concert hall etc.of which I am sure you are all well aware.

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 1.24.53 AM

The immorality, prejudice, and violent acts of the anti-semites and the jihadists have to be exposed, condemned, and prosecuted both by individuals, the media, and the state, if Europe is to make any headway in its current struggle with Islamic jihad and antisemitism. We all have to clearly understand what is antisemitism, what is Islamic jihad, and we must expose these and any other  pernicious political currents that promote violence as a tool for change.

If you want to see the insidious workings of these forces in the world for yourself  watch this report on a notorious U.N. human rights official Alfred de Zayas — a hero to Holocaust deniers — for his new essay absurdly blaming the Paris terrorist attacks on America, the West and Israel.

Are these ideologies important to understand? Yes indeed, for the sake of all humanity. If we don’t open our eyes, face these issues, and do our part, we are all doomed.

And here is a video of the seminar by Professor Jikeli that I participated in at McGill that this essay is based on:

 

 

Islamic Terrorism on the World Stage Post Paris Attacks

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 1.24.53 AMOver the weekend, the Islamic State issued a Statement on the Blessed Onslaught in Paris against the Crusader Nation of France.

The “believers” who carried out the attack, it says, regarded Paris as

“the capital of prostitution and vice, the lead carrier of the cross in Europe.”

The above is a quote from an article in the Washington Post: Reality Check: Forget Paris: Will We Ever Learn by Clifford May. Here is more from that same article detailing the time-posts of the Jihadi-wars. Some of us have long memories.

For almost two generations, since Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, self-proclaimed jihadis have been fighting to re-establish Islamic supremacy and domination in the world. Leaders of the nations they have been targeting have regarded them as a problem – but mostly not as dangerous enemies who must be decisively defeated. And so their numbers have grown and their ability to project power has increased. The Islamic State, an al Qaeda splinter that arose after America’s withdrawal from Iraq in 2011, was quick to take responsibility for last week’s carnage in Paris. This follows by less than a year its attacks on Charlie Hebdo and a French Jewish supermarket. Also attributed to the Islamic State: a double suicide-bombing in Beirut on Thursday and, in October, a bombing in Ankara and the blowing up of a Russian passenger jet.

The Islamic State’s rival is the Islamic Republic of Iran, which prefers to pretend it was not behind such attacks as those in Beirut in 1983, Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994, Berlin in 1992, and Burgas, Bulgaria, in 2012; not to mention the failed plots to bomb New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport in 2007 and a restaurant in Washington, D.C., in 2011.

Also alive and well and lethal: Nigeria-based Boko Haram, Somalia-based al Shabaab, Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Taliban in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. I could go on.

As the blood ran red in Parisian streets, President Obama responded with expressions of sympathy and support for the victims. He should not be faulted for that. Nor should he be expected, at such moments, to say anything incisive or insightful. What is disappointing – though no longer surprising – is how reflexively he distorts reality to conform to his unwavering preconceptions. The attack in Paris, he insisted, was directed against “all of humanity and the universal values that we share.

By now it should be fairly obvious that the terrorists are targeting only specific subsets of humanity: e.g., Christians, Jews, secularists and other “infidels,” along with any Muslims who refuse to embrace their medieval reading of Islam. And self-evidently, the jihadis and those cheering for them do not share Mr. Obama’s values, which means, by definition, those values are not “universal.” (emphasis mine) Time and again, the jihadis have demonstrated that they have other values and that they are willing – indeed, eager – to both kill and die for them.

Ignoring that, Western leaders have prattled on about “countering violent extremism” through jobs programs and foreign aid. They have maintained that “there is no military solution” and that we can rely on diplomats to effectuate “conflict resolution” employing “soft power” and “smart power.” Mr. Obama has reassured us: “The tide of war is receding.”

When our enemies are more honest about who they are and what motivates them than most of our political leaders, academics and journalists, we have a problem.

Who is prepared to begin fixing it? Among those vying to succeed Mr. Obama is there anyone who strikes you as having the courage and the leadership skills necessary to facilitate what Churchill, at a moment when the Third Reich seemed unstoppable, called “a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigor”? (Would most Americans today even understand that phrase?) The next commander in chief must resume leadership of the Free World (another phrase that, sadly, has come to sound archaic) and develop a comprehensive strategy to defeat jihadism in all its forms – Sunni and Shia alike.

Such a strategy will need to include a muscular military component. That necessitates rebuilding, rather than continuing to diminish, the armed forces of both America and Europe. Immigration reform is urgent – with national security as the top priority, not an afterthought. Nations willing to fight jihadi forces require much more support from Washington than they’ve been receiving over recent years.

A war of ideas – a war against jihadism and Islamic supremacism – is long overdue. Such endangered Western values as freedom and tolerance must be defended. Currently, that’s not even happening on American campuses.

If you can identify such a candidate, he (or she) deserves your vote. The alternative is to forget Paris and let this cancer metastasize for another generation or two. By then, however, our children and grandchildren will be living in a very different world from the one our parents bequeathed to us.” (emphasis mine)