Oppenheimer tells the story of Robert Oppenheimer, the scientist responsible for developing the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. While the film explores the world of scientific discovery, I found Oppenheimer’s personal and political challenges, especially after 1954, particularly compelling. The film captures the tension between groundbreaking innovation and the weight of moral responsibility, raising questions that linger long after the credits roll.
Political Intrigues and Allegations
As the film unfolds, Oppenheimer becomes increasingly difficult to figure out. His political affiliations, personal choices, and the question of whether he might have shared atomic secrets with the USSR all come into question. The movie doesn’t shy away from his extramarital affair or the tragic death of his mistress, which adds to the complexity of his character. I left the theatre searching for answers, wanting to better understand the man behind the science.
In my search for more context, I came across an interview between JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan Tobin and historian Harvey Klehr. Klehr’s insights into Soviet espionage revealed how deeply the Soviets had infiltrated American scientific circles, including the Manhattan Project, as early as the 1930s. Oppenheimer’s ties to individuals sympathetic to communism—like his students at Berkeley and his wife’s second husband—only heightened the suspicions around him. These revelations shed light on the tense political landscape Oppenheimer had to navigate, where even personal connections could raise national security concerns.
Interestingly, despite his connections, FBI wiretaps reveal that once Oppenheimer took charge of the Manhattan Project, he made a clear effort to distance himself from communism. This detail changed how I viewed him—he wasn’t just a political pawn but someone navigating a complex and ever-changing political landscape.¹
Espionage and Betrayal
The film uncovers a surprising piece of history: two spies were secretly involved in the Manhattan Project. One was Ted Hall, an 18-year-old physicist who thought sharing atomic secrets with the Soviets might create a balance of power and, paradoxically, make the world safer. It’s remarkable to think about the moral weight of such a decision on someone so young. The recent documentary The Compassionate Spy defends Hall’s actions, and his apology, featured in The New York Times Magazine article “The Boy Who Gave Away The Bomb,” adds a personal touch to the historical narrative. The second spy, Klaus Fuchs, also leaked crucial information, and his capture highlighted the broad scope of Soviet espionage during the Cold War.
In the film’s third hour, we see Oppenheimer’s security clearance revoked in 1954, a dramatic turn in his life. While the film primarily attributes this to alleged espionage, my research points to a different angle. According to an article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Oppenheimer’s opposition to the hydrogen bomb might have been the real reason for his downfall. This perspective offers a richer understanding of his story, suggesting that his professional beliefs, rather than personal faults, could have led to his tragic end.
Contemporary Relevance
Oppenheimer’s story still resonates today, showing us the ongoing challenge of balancing scientific progress with ethical concerns. The political conflicts and moral dilemmas he faced are very much with us as modern nations wrestle with the responsibilities of technological advancements. In places like China and North Korea, technology is used not just for progress but also for control, reflecting the same issues Oppenheimer dealt with in his time. Historian Timothy Snyder even links Putin’s tactics today with Stalin’s during Oppenheimer’s era, highlighting how these cycles of power and fear continue across generations.
Reflecting on these themes, I was reminded of Harold P. Green’s The Oppenheimer Case, which explores how political abuse contributed to Oppenheimer’s downfall. It reminds us that political agendas often overshadow human rights, a still relevant theme in today’s global landscape.
As I watched the film, I couldn’t help but think of Yishai Rebo’s haunting chant, “Ata Zocher.” His lyrics, “You (G-d) remember all the workings of the universe / And you note all the creatures of this world,” echoed in my mind, encapsulating the film’s themes of responsibility and the search for understanding. The chant reminded me of the burden that comes with knowledge—the same burden Oppenheimer faced as he unlocked the power of the atom.
Final Thoughts
Oppenheimer is more than a retelling of history—it’s a story that compels us to confront today’s moral dilemmas. Kai Bird, Oppenheimer’s biographer, captures this poignantly:
“Sadly, Oppenheimer’s life story is relevant to our current political predicaments. Oppenheimer was destroyed by a political movement characterized by rank know-nothing, anti-intellectual, xenophobic demagogues. The witch-hunters of that season are the direct ancestors of our current political actors of a specific paranoid style. Oppenheimer did not regret what he did at Los Alamos; he understood that you cannot stop curious human beings from discovering the physical world around them. One cannot halt the scientific quest, nor can one un-invent the atomic bomb, but it is up to each and every one of us to ensure that our current technologies are integrated by our leaders into a sustainable and humane civilization.”²
Bird’s reflection shows Oppenheimer’s life is more than a historical footnote. His story warns of the dangers when scientific progress is misused by political agendas. The choices made in his era still impact us today, reminding us to approach technology and power with wisdom and responsibility.
Footnotes:
- “Holodomor.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 2 Jan. 2024, www.britannica.com/event/Holodomor.
- Bird, Kai. “American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.” The New York Times, 2023, July 17. www.nytimes.com